Other Guilford School District schools:
A. W. Cox School,
Guilford High School,
Guilford Lakes School,
Melissa Jones School,
A. Baldwin Middle School,
E. C. Adams Middle School
| Grades | Total | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian | American Indian | Two or more races |
| K | 62 | 58 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Grade 1 | 66 | 57 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
|
| Grade 2 | 62 | 53 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Grade 3 | 76 | 68 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
|
| Grade 4 | 69 | 55 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
|
| Total | 335 | 291 | 4 | 14 | 19 | 0 | 7 |
During school year 2010-2011(the most recent data year available), Calvin Leete School Elementary School had 335 students and 24 full time teachers. The student ratio was 14. Regarding the gender, 167 students were female, 168 students were male. Regarding the racial makeup of the students, 291 were white, 4 were African American, 14 were Hispanic, 19 were Asian(including Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander), 0 were American Indian or Alaska Native, 7 were reported from two or more races.
Totally 17 students were eligible for subsidized lunch program: 8 students were eligible for free lunch, 9 students were eligible for reduced price lunch.Calvin Leete School Elementary School is located at 280 South Union St, Guilford, CT 06437. The school environment is Suburb, Large Territory.
Calvin Leete School Elementary School belongs to New Haven County and is managed by Guilford School District school district. It serves students from grade KG to grade 04. The school's operational status is Open, Operational. Please call their phone number 203-453-2726 for more information about the school's enrollment and education programs.
Calvin Leete School's rating score is 8 out of 10 by SchoolMap.org on 2/28/2012.
School Year: 2010-2011
Data source: Institute of Education Sciences (IES), United States Department of Education
Special Code:
N: an alphanumeric value is neither expected nor measured.
-2: a numeric value is neither expected nor measured.
M: an alphanumeric value is expected but none was measured.
-1: a numeric value is expected but none was measured.